A large part of the Bibliography presented here was compiled in electronic form by William Duba using the files of the Section Latine (Centre Felix-Grat) of the Institut de Recherches et d'Histoire des Textes in Paris; Russ Friedman has since updated the list and reworked it into the present electronic version. Thanks go to Chris Schabel and Vasilis Syros for help with bibliographic references, and acknowledgement must be made to the excellent Bibliographie annuelle du moyen age tardiff published by the Section Latine of the Institut de Recherches et d'Histoire des Textes: it has definitely made easier the job of those interested in later medieval philosophy.

This Bibliography is work in progress; if you know of a study that you think should be here, but isn't, please send a complete reference to Russ Friedman, and I will update accordingly. In addition, I'd be happy if any inaccuracies or outright mistakes were reported so I could correct them. Note that the phrase 'Auriol Studies' is meant to be broadly construed: I'd like to include here any article or book that deals in a substantial way with Auriol (if possible with reference to pages or sections of particular relevance to those interested in Auriol).

The Bibliography is divided into a section dealing with Primary Texts and a section dealing with Secondary Literature. Comments to the bibliographic entries are announced by an arrow (->).
 
 

NB: Any bibliographic entries marked with: ++ (i.e., two plus signs) before the author's name have been added to the bibliography since the version of September 8, 2000.
 

[Back to Auriol Homepage start page]
 
 

The Peter Auriol Homepage
 

For a list of manuscripts of Auriol's works, see here.
 

Scriptum super primum Sententiarum

See The Electronic Scriptum, an ongoing attempt to put all of the Scriptum (as found in Vat. Borgh. lat. 329) on the web in PDF files - includes a question list for the work.
 

E. M. Buytaert, ed., Peter Aureoli Scriptum Super Primum Sententiarum,2 vols. (St. Bonaventure, NY 1952-56)
-> Scriptum,Prologue and dd. 1-8 edited from Vat.Borgh. lat 329 (the copy of this work presented by Auriol to Pope John XXII).
-> confer the review of this work by Valens Heynck in Franziskanische Studien 35 (1953), pp. 468-70.

Scriptum,d. 9, part 1 (on concepts and concept formation) in R.L. Friedman, "In principio erat Verbum:The Incorporation of Philosophical Psychology into Trinitarian Theology, 1250-1325" Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa (1997), Appendix 4, pp. 468-96.
-> preliminary edition based on two mss; superseded by text found as part of The Electronic Scriptum.

Scriptum,d. 23 (on first and second intentions) has been almost completely edited (from Vat.Borgh. lat. 329) in J. Pinborg "Radulphus Brito on Universals" Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin35 (1980), pp. 133-137, together with D. Perler, "Peter Aureol vs. Hervaeus Natalis on Intentionality: A Text Edition with Introductory Remarks" Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age61 (1994), pp. 227-62.
-> The entire text of d. 23 has recently been reedited on the basis of Vat. Borgh. lat. 329 by L.M. de Rijk in his Giraldus Odonis O.F.M. Opera Philosophica. Vol II: De Intentionibus. Critical Edition with a Study of the Medieval Intentionality Debate up to Ca. 1350 (Leiden, 2005), pp. 695-747.

Scriptum,d. 27 (part one on the categories of action,passion, and relation; part two on concepts and concept formation) in R.L. Friedman, "In principio erat Verbum" (cit. above), Appendix 2-3, pp. 371-467.
-> preliminary edition based on five mss, manuscript study of d. 27 in ibid., Appendix 1; the versions of the texts found in "In principio" have been superseded by those found on the The Electronic Scriptum.

Scriptum,d. 35, part 4 (on intellectual cognition of singulars) ed. by R. Friedman at this website under Editions & Translations on the Web (and now found as part of The Electronic Scriptum.)
-> preliminary edition based on Vat.Borgh. lat 329.

Scriptum,d. 38-39 in C.D. Schabel, "Peter Aureol on Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents: Scriptum in Primum Sententiarum,distinctions 38-39"Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin65 (1995), pp. 63-212.
-> full edition from all known manuscripts; supersedes Ph. Boehner's edition of Scriptum, d. 38, a. 3 in The Tractatus de praedestinatione et de praescientia Dei et de futuris contingentibus of William Ockham, Together with a Study of a Three-Valued Logic(St. Bonaventure, NY 1945), Appendix IV.

Scriptum,dd. 40 (aa. 1 and 4), 41 (aa. 1 and 3), and 45-47 (on predestination and divine will) in J. Halverson, "Peter Aureol and the Re-emergence of Predestinarian Pluralism in Latin Theology, 1317-1344" (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa 1993), pp. 295-436
-> preliminary edition based on four mss.

For a list and analysis of all of Auriol's references in the Scriptum to University scholars, see Chris Schabel's "Auriol's Rubrics: Citations of University Theologians in Peter Auriol's Scriptum in Primum Librum Sententiarum", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 3-38.
 

Reportatio in I Sent.

Ph. Boehner, "Notitia intuitivaof Non-Existents according to Peter Aureoli, OFM (1322)" Franciscan Studies8 (1948), pp. 388-416 (also contained in Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 41 (1949), pp. 289-307).
-> 411-16 (pp. 304-07 in Rivista): edition of "redactio prima" = Rep. I, prologus, q.1.

S. Brown, ed., "Petrus Aureoli: De unitate conceptus entis (Reportatio Parisiensis in I Sententiarum, dist. 2, p. 1, qq. 1-3 et p. 2, qq. 1-2)", Traditio50 (1995), pp. 199-248.

-> A complete edition of the hitherto unpublished Rep. in I Sent.is currently in preparation by R. Friedman, L. Nielsen, and C. Schabel.  For a discussion of the extant versions of this text see L.O. Nielsen, "Peter Auriol's Way with Words: The Genesis of Peter Auriol's Commentaries on Peter Lombard's First and Fourth Books of the Sentences",in G.R. Evans (ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard(Brill, 2002), pp. 149-219, supplemented by C.D. Schabel, Theology at Paris 1316-1345:Peter Auriol and the Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents(Ashgate, 2000), Ch. 3.
 

Reportationes in II, III, IV Sent. and Quodlibet

Commentariorum in Secundum, Tertium, Quartum Libros Sententiarum Pars Secunda(Rome, 1605)
-> edition of a version of these books and the Quodlibet, often unreliable.

For a list of questions for Auriol's II Sent. based on the text found in the 1605 edition, see here.
For a list of questions for the extant versions of Auriol's III Sent., see here.

II  Sent.,d. 2, part 3, q. 1 (on place), in C. Schabel, "Place, Space, and the Physics of Grace in Auriol's Sentences Commentary", Vivarium38 (2000), pp.117-61, esp. 143-54.

E.M. Buytaert, ed., "Aureoli's Unpublished Reportatio III, d. 3, q. 1-2" Franciscan Studies15 (1955), pp. 159-74.
-> Critical edition of the unprinted (and more popular) version of book III, d. 3, qq. 1-2 (dealing with the immaculate conception).

-> For at least books III and IV (and possibly book II) there are several extant versions of Auriol's commentary.
-> On book IV, see L.O. Nielsen, "Peter Auriol's Way with Words: The Genesis of Peter Auriol's Commentaries on Peter Lombard's First and Fourth Books of the  Sentences”,in G.R. Evans (ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard(Brill, 2002), pp. 149-219.
-> On book III, see V. Heynck, "Die Kommentare des Petrus Aureoli zum dritten Sentenzenbuch", Franziskanische Studien51 (1969), pp. 1-77, and W. Duba, "The Immaculate Conception in the Works of Peter Auriol", Vivarium38 (2000), pp. 5-34.
-> On book II see Schabel's article referred to above.
-> On the Quodlibet, see most recently L.O. Nielsen, "The Quodlibet of Peter Auriol", in Chris Schabel (ed.), Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. The Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2007), pp. 267-331.
 

Compendium litteralis sensus totius scripturae, extremely popular work, of which we have (according to Stegmüller's Repertorium of Biblical commentaries, s.v. Petrus Aureoli + nr. 8883 in suppl. volume s.v. Petrus Aureoli) some 60 manuscripts and which was printed some 15 times between 1476 and 1896.
-> most recent edition is: Ph. Seeboeck, ed., Compendium sensus litteralis totius divinae Scripturae a clarissimo theologo fr. Petro Aureoli O. Min.(Quaracchi 1896).

Commentarius in Iohannem sive compendiosa expositio evangelii Iohannis (ca. 1314) ed. Friedrich Stegmüller in Franziskanische Studien33 (1951), pp. 207-219.

De conceptione B. M. V. /Repercussorium editum contra adversarium innocentiae matris Dei (composed in Toulouse 1314/15) Ed. [Lemmen, ed.] Fr. Guilielmi Guarrae, Fr. Ioannis Duns Scoti, Fr. Petri Aureoli Qq. disputatae de immaculata conceptione BMV,Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica medii aevi 3 (Quaracchi 1904), pp. 23-94/95-153.
-> A new edition taking into account all of the extant manuscripts would be advantageous; cf. W. Duba, "The Immaculate Conception in the Works of Peter Auriol", Vivarium38 (2000), pp. 5-34, esp. p. 34.

De paupertate et usu paupere published by Bonifacius Cera (Ceva) in  Firmamenta trium ordinum beatissimi Patris nostri sancti Francisci(Paris 1512), IV, ff.116r-130.
-> E. Longpré, "Le Quolibet de Nicholas de Lyre, OFM", Archivum Franciscanum Historicum23 (1930), pp. 42-56 edited a question on the subject of poverty from ms. Vat. lat. 869, claiming that it was q. 8 of a quodlibet of Nicholas of Lyra; this question was reattributed to Auriol by F. Pelster, who (in "Nikolaus von Lyra und seine Quaestio de usu paupere", Archivum Franciscanum Historicum46 [1953], pp. 211-50, esp. pp. 213-14) claimed that it is in actuality a second redaction of Auriol's treatise De usu paupere; Pelster argued at length for his claim in "Zur Überlieferung des Quodlibet und anderer Schriften des Petrus Aureoli OFM" Franciscan Studies14 [1954], esp. pp. 408-11.
 
 

Other works of Auriol's that are still unedited:

Recommendatio S. Scripturae:BnF 14566, ff. 2-7.

Postilla in Apocalypsim
Firenze,  Bibl. Laurentiana, Conv. sopp. 135, fol. 147-156v
ms de Little (anc. Phillipps 12290, fol. 181-201)
-> Benz, "Die Geschichtstheologie" announced an edition.
 

Non-existent Work

Quaestiones in Metaphysicam
Lohr, "Medieval Latin Aristotelian Commentaries",s.v. 'Petrus Aureoli' (in Traditio 28, 1972, pp. 346-47) , citing Doucet, "L'oeuvre scolastique de Richard de Conington, OFM", Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 29 (1936), pp. 396-442, at pp. 415-16, attributes to Auriol a Quaestiones in Metaphysicam of 22 questions in ms. Padova Biblioteca Universitaria 1580, ff. 167r-228v (see the list of questions in Doucet's article, loc. cit.), with stray questions also found in Munich, SB Clm. 8717, f. 102r-v (q. 9) and in Padova, Bibl. Antoniana 173, ff. 45v-47v (q. 1, ascribed). But this isn't an independent work of Auriol's on the metaphysics; rather we find here 22 physical and metaphysical questions some of which are drawn from Auriol's II Sent. (as Doucet notes, art. cit., p. 416; see C. Schabel, "Place, Space, and the Physics of Grace in Auriol's Sentences commentary", Vivarium 38/1 (2000), pp. 117-61, esp. 155-56).
 

[Back to top of this page]                                                    [Back to Auriol Homepage start page]

Citations internal to this bibliography are of the form: author's last name, shortened title.
 
 

[Back to top of this page]                                                    [Back to Auriol Homepage start page]

Adams, M.M.
"Ockham's Nominalism and Unreal Entities", Philosophical Review86 (1977), pp. 144-76.

Adams, M.M.
William Ockham (Notre Dame, 1987)
-> See index.

++ Alféri, P.
Guillaume d'Ockham. Le Singulier (Paris, 1989), esp. pp. 216-39.
-> On Auriol's theory of concepts and Ockham's critique of it. Cf. Joël Biard's review in Vivarium 29 (1991), pp. 148-49 and Denery, "The Appearance of Reality", p. 38 n. 32.

Alliney, G.
"Fra Scoto e Ockham: Giovanni di Reading e il dibattito sulla libertà a Oxford (1310-1320)", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale7 (1996), pp. 243-368, esp. pp. 269-81.

++ Amerini, F.
"Realism and Intentionality: Hervaeus Natalis, Peter Aureoli, and William Ockham in Discussion", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 239-60.

Azanza, A.
"La polémica de Pedro de Atarrabia (m. 1347) con Pedro Auréolo (m. 1322) sobre la intuición del no-existente", Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval2 (1995), pp. 71-78.

Bakker, P.J.J.M.
La raisonet le miracle. Les doctrines eucharistiques (c. 1250-c. 1400). Contribution à l'étude des rapports entre philosophie et théologie(Nijmegen, 1999), 2 vols.
-> volume I deals with Auriol a great deal.

Baldissera, A.
"La decisione del concilio di Vienne (1311) 'Substantia animae rationalis seu intellectivae vere ac per se humani corporis forma' nell'interpretazione di un contemporaneo", Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica34 (1942), pp. 212-32.

Baudry, L
La querelle des futurscontingents (Louvain 1465-1475). Textes inédits(Paris: J. Vrin, 1950).
-> Cf. Schabel, "Peter de Rivo", "Peter Aureol",  and Theology at Paris, as well as the English translation of Baudry's  work: The Quarrel over Future Contingents.  Louvain, 1465-1475, trans. Rita Guerlac (Dordrecht 1989)

Benz, E.
"Die Geschichtstheologie der Franziskanerspiritualen des 13. und 14. Jahrhunderts nach neuen Quellen", Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte2 (1933), pp. 111-118.
-> Announced an edition of the Postilla in apocalypsim.

Benz, E.
Ecclesia spiritualis. Kirchenidee und Geschichtstheologie der Franziskanischen Reformation(Stuttgart 1934), esp. 432-58.
-> Cf. Roest, Reading the Book, pp. 184-85.

Bernards, M.
"Zur Überlieferung mittelalterlicher theologischen Schriften. Neue Handschriften", Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale19 (1952), pp. 327-36.
-> p. 332 Bernards annouces Auriol's Compendium litteralis sensus totius S. Scripturaein ms. Koblenz 261 (am ende unvollständig) and XLV quaestiones theologicaein ms. Dusseldorf B 159 (s. XV); on the latter work, see Stegmüller, pp. 657-61.

Beumer, J.
"Der Augustinismus in der theologischen Erkenntnislehre des Petrus Aureoli", Franziskanische Studien36, pp. 137-71 (1954).

++ Biard, J.
"La 'science divine' comme paradigme du savoir chez quelques auteurs du XIVe siècle: Pierre d'Auriole, Grégoire de Rimini", in R. Rashed and J. Biard (eds.), Les doctrines de la science de l'antiquité à l'age classique (Peeters, 1999), pp. 189-209.

++ Biard, J.
"Intention et presence: La notion de presentialitas au XIVe siècle", in D. Perler (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Brill, 2001), pp. 265-82.
-> see especially section devoted to Auriol on pp. 270-77.

Boehner, Ph.
"Notitia intuitivaof Non-Existents according to Peter Aureoli, OFM (1322)", Franciscan Studies8 (1948), pp. 388-416 (article reprinted in Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica41 (1949) pp. 289-307).
-> pp. 411-416 contains an edition of "redactio prima" = Rep. I, prologus, q.1.

Bolyard, C.
"Knowing  naturaliter:Auriol's propositional foundations", Vivarium38 (2000), pp. 162-76.

Bolyard, C.
"Knowledge, Certainty, and Propositions per se notae:a Study of Peter Auriol", Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington (1999).

++ Bonino, S.-Th.
"Capreolus contre Pierre Auriol: une certaine idée de la connaissance", in Guy Bedouelle, Romanus Cessario, and Kevin White, eds., Jean Capreolus en son temps (1380-1444) (Paris, 1997)
-> Auriol, one of the thinkers whom Capreolus most likes to discuss, appears often throughout this volume.

Brampton, P.K.
"A Note on Auriol, Ockham, and Ms. Borghese 329", Gregorianum41 (1960), pp. 713-16.
-> compte-rendu in RHE 57(1962).  329 is 1st redaction, not definitive version.

++Brenet, J-B.
"Moi qui pense, moi qui souffre. Le problème de l'identité du composé humain dans la riposte anti-Averroiste de Pierre d'Auriole et Grégoire de Rimini", in O. Boulnois (ed.), Généalogies du sujet de Saint Anselme à Malebranche (Vrin, 2007), pp. 151-69.

Brown, S.F.
"The Unity of the Concept of Being in Peter Aureoli's Scriptum and Commentarium (with a critical edition of the Commentarium text)", Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Louvain (1964).

Brown, S.F.
"Avicenna and the Unity of the Concept of Being: The Interpretation of Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, Gerard of Bologna and Peter Aureoli", Franciscan Studies25 (1965), pp. 117-50.

++ Brown, S.F.
"Peter of Candia's Hundred-Year 'History' of the Theologian's Role", Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1 (1991), pp. 156-90 (discussion of Auriol, pp. 162-69).

++ Brown, S.F.
"Guido Terrena and the Unity of the Concept of Being", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 3/2 (1992), pp. 599-631, esp. pp. 610-12.

Brown, S.F.
"Petrus Aureoli: De unitate conceptus entis (Reportatio Parisiensis in I Sententiarum, dist. 2, p. 1, qq. 1-3 et p. 2, qq. 1-2)", Traditio50 (1995), pp. 199-248.

++ Brown, S.F.
"L'unité du concept d'être au debut du quatorzième siècle", in L. Honnefelder et al. (eds.), John Duns Scotus. Metaphysics and Ethics (Leiden - New York, 1996), pp. 327-44, passim but esp. 336-44.

++ Brown, S.F.
"Declarative and Deductive Theology in the Early Fourteenth Century", in J.A. Aertsen and A. Speer (eds.),  Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter?(Berlin 1998), pp. 648-55.

Brown, S.F.
"The Intellectual Context of Later Medieval Philosophy: Universities, Aristotle, Arts, Theology", in J. Marenbon (ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy,vol. III Medieval Philosophy(1998), pp. 188-201
-> esp. pp. 198-200.

Brown, S.F.
"Walter Burley, Peter Aureoli, and Gregory of Rimini", in J. Marenbon (ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy,vol. III Medieval Philosophy(1998), pp. 368-85.

++ Brown, S.F.
"Declarative Theology after Durandus: Its Re-presentation and Defense by Peter Aureoli", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 401-21

++ Burr, D.
Olivi's Peaceable Kingdom. A Reading of The Apocalypse Commentary (Philadelphia 1993).
-> esp. pp. 247-51, 259-60 on Auriol.

Buytaert, E.M., ed.
Peter Aureoli Scriptum Super Primum Sententiarum,2 vols. (St. Bonaventure, NY 1952-56).
-> See Buytaert's introduction on Auriol's life and works (especially on the Scriptum),vol. 1, pp. vii-xxviii.

Buytaert, E.M.
"Damascenus latinus: on item 417 of Stegmueller's Repertorium Commentariorum", Franciscan Studies13 (1953), pp. 37ff.
-> pp. 47-51(?) treat Auriol.  A. 329 is 1st redaction, not definitive version.  B. Treatment of Tractatus de Principiis.

Buytaert, E.M.
"Aureoli's Unpublished Reportatio III, dist. 3, Q. 1-2", Franciscan Studies15 (1955), pp. 159-74.
-> Deals with the Immaculate Conception.

Cannizzo, G.
"La dottrina del 'Verbum mentis' in Pietro d'Auvergne. Contributo alla storia del concetto di intenzionalità", Rivista di filosofianeo-scolastica53 (1961), pp. 158-59.
-> deals with Auriol's Scriptum,d. 9 part 1; d. 27, part 2.

Cannizzo, G.
Il Sorgere di "Notitia Intuitiva" all'alba del pensiero moderno. Oxford/Parigi nell'Europa del primo trecento (1298-1318)Palermo (1984).

Conti, A.
"Divine Ideas and Exemplar Causality in Auriol", Vivarium 38 (2000), pp. 99-116.

Courtenay, W.J.
Adam Wodeham: An Introduction to His Life and Writings(Leiden 1978).

Courtenay, W.J.
"The Role of English Thought in the Transformation of University Education in the Late Middle Ages", in J. M. Kittelson and P.J. Transue (ed.), Rebirth, Reform and Resilience: Universities in Transition, 1300-1700(Ohio State UP, 1984), pp. 103-62.

Courtenay, W.J.
Schools and Scholars in Fourteenth-Century England(Princeton UP, 1987).

Courtenay, W.J.
Capacity and Volition: A History of the Distinction of Absolute and Ordained Power(Bergamo 1990).

++ Courtenay, W.J.
"Between Despair and Love. Some Late Medieval Modifications of Augustine's Teaching on Fruition and Psychic States", in K. Hagen, (ed.), Augustine, the Harvest, and Theology (1300-1650). Essays Dedicated to Heiko Augustinus Obermann  in Honor of his Sixtieth Birthday (Leiden, 1990), pp. 5-20.

++ Cova, L.
"Francesco di Meyronnes e Walter Catton nella controversia scolastica sulla 'Notitia intuitiva de re non existente'", Medioevo: Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale  2 (1976), pp. 227-51.
-> Auriol appears throughout as one of the major interlocutors of both Meyronnes and Chatton on intuitive cognition.

++ Cross, R.
"A Trinitarian Debate in Early Fourteenth-Century Christology", Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 70,2 (2003), pp. 233-74
-> A study of a text of John Baconthorpe, which includes a lengthy discussion of Peter Auriol's view on the incarnation, pp. 261-66, and further pp. 266-74.

++ Damiata, M.
I problemi di G. d'Ockham, 3 vols: I. La conoscenza (Florence, 1996), II. Dio (Florence, 1997), III. La natura (Florence 1998).
-> on Auriol, see esp. vols. I, pp. 85-92 (on esse intentionale), and in vol. II see the index for discussions of Auriol and Ockham on habitus theologicus, practical theology, and grace and acceptation.

++ Darge, R.
"Omne ens est conveniens. Ursprung und Entwicklung eines spätmittelalterlichen Neuansatzes der Theorie des ontischen Gutseins", Salzburger Jahrbuch für Philosophie 50 (2005), pp. 9-27.
-> Auriol is discussed on pp. 16-20
-> Thanks to Jan Aertsen for bringing this article to my attention.

++ Davenport, A.
"Esse Egressus and Esse Apparens in Peter Auriol's Theory of Intentional Being", Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum, XXXV, 2006, pp. 60-84.

Day, S.
Intuitive Cognition.  A Key to the Significance of the Later Scholastics(St. Bonaventure, NY 1947).

Dedek, J. F.
"Intrinsically Evil Acts: The Emergence of a Doctrine", Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale50 (1983), pp. 191-226 (1983).
-> cf. p. 221.

Dedieu, H.
"Les ministres provinceaux d'Aquitaine des origines à la division de l'Ordre (XIIIe s. - 1517)", Archivum Franciscanum Historicum76 (1983), pp. 187-92.

++ Dekker, D.-J.
"John the Canon on time and Motion. A Case Study in Aristotelian Natural Philosophy and Early Scotism", in C. Leijenhorst, C. Lüthy, and J.M.M.H. Thijssen (eds.), The Dynamics of Aristotelian Natural Philosophy from Antiquity to the Seventeenth Century (Leiden 2002), 225-48.
-> deals with Auriol (and John the Canon's reaction to Auriol) passim.

Denery, D.G.
"The Appearance of Reality: Peter Aureol and the Experience of Perceptual Error", Franciscan Studies55 (1998), pp. 17-52.

++ Denery, D.G.
Seeing and Being Seen in the Later Medieval World. Optics, Theology, and Religious Life (Cambridge, 2005).
-> Ch. 4 (pp. 117-36) deals mostly with Auriol and his theory of esse apparens and perceptual error.

Dettloff, W.
Die Entwicklung der Akzeptations- und Verdienstlehre von Duns Scotus bis Luther mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Franziskanertheologen BGPTM 40.2. (Münster 1963).
-> Esp. pp. 22-94.

++ Dewender, T.
"Der ontologische Status der Relationen nach Durandus von St.-Pourcain, Hervaeus Natalis und Petrus Aureoli", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 287-307

++ Diedrich, Everett A.
The Doctrine of Peter Aureoli on Habitual Grace (Rome: Unpublished Dissertation, Gregorianum, 1956).

Di Lella, A.
"The Immaculate Conception in the Writings of Peter Aureoli", Franciscan Studies15  (1955), pp. 146-58.

Doucet, V.**
Archivum Franciscanum Historicum27 (1934), pp. 562-63.

Doucet, V.
"L'oeuvre scolastique de Richard de Conington", Archivum Franciscanum Historicum29 (1936).
-> Esp. pp. 415-16.

Doucet, V.
Commentaires sur les Sentences, Supplément au répertoire de M. Frédéric Stegmüller(Florence 1954), no. 658, p. 67.
-> 661: Sarnano E. 92 (v. Miscel. Franc.47, 1947?, c. 502); c'est sans doute le ms. qui a servi au Card. Costanzo Sarnano pour son édition. Aucun autre ms. connu.

Dreiling, R.
Der Konzeptualismus in der Universalienlehre des Franziskanerbischofs Petrus Aureoli (Pierre d'Auriole)BGPTM 11.6 (Münster 1913).
-> Cf. Friedman, "Peter Auriol on Intentions and Essential Predication".

Duba, W.
"The Immaculate Conception in the Works of Peter Auriol", Vivarium38 (2000), pp. 5-34.

Duba, W.
"Aristotle's Metaphysics in Peter Auriol's Commentary on the Sentences", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale12 (2001), pp. 549-73.

Duba, W.
"Aristotelian Traditions in Franciscan Thought: Matter and Potency According to Scotus and Auriol", in I. Taifacos (ed.), The Origins of European Scholarship, pp. 147-61.

++ Duhem, P.
Études sur Léonard de Vinci, 3 vols. Paris, 1906-13, vol. 3, pp. 340-41.
-> on latitude of forms and "concharitas" (and cf. Schabel, "Place, Space, and the Physics of Grace").

Duhem, P.
Le Système du monde: Histoire des doctrine cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic,vols. 6-7 (Paris 1956-59).
-> vol. VI: 388, 390-423 (on Aristotelianism, essence/existence, individuation, prime matter, potentiality and act, human soul, and the heavens) , 432, 444-6, 458, 461-2, 511, 550, 557, 578, 583, 588, 591, 596, 600, 680-1,  683
-> vol. VII: 14, 99-103 (infinitely large), 116, 224-5 (on place), 239, 254, 311, 315-7 (time), 327-31 (movement), 335, 368-74 (time), 509-12 (forms), 519.
-> See also relevant places in the partial English translation Medieval Cosmology. Theories of Infinity, Place, Time, Void, and the Plurality of Worlds,ed. et trans. Roger Ariew (Chicago 1985).

++ Dumont, S.D.
"New Questions by Thomas Wylton", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 9 (1998), 341-79.
-> pp. 348-50, 365-66 deal with Auriol's debate with Wylton over the ontological status of a real relation.

Friedman, R.L., and Schabel, C. D.
"The Vitality of Franciscan Theology at Paris in the 1320's : MS Wien, Palatinus 1439”, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age63 (1996), pp. 357-72.

Friedman, R.L.
"In principio erat Verbum:The Incorporation of Philosophical Psychology into Trinitarian  Theology, 1250-1325", Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa (1997).
-> on Auriol esp. ch. 7; appendices contain editions of Scriptum,d. 9 part 1, and d. 27 along with manuscript study.

Friedman, R.L.
"Conceiving and Modifying Reality: Some Modist Roots of Peter Auriol's Theory of Concept Formation", in Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XII-XIV Century).C. Marmo, ed. (Turnhout, 1997), pp. 305-21.

Friedman, R.L.
"Peter Auriol on Intentions and Essential Predication", in S. Ebbesen and R.L. Friedman (eds.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen, 1999), pp. 415-30.

Friedman, R.L.
"Divergent Traditions in Later-Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Relations, Emanations, and the Use of Philosophical Psychology, 1250-1325", Studia Theologica53 (1999), 13-25.

Friedman, R.L.
"Peter Auriol on Intellectual Cognition of Singulars", Vivarium38 (2000), pp. 177-93.

Friedman, R.L.
"The SentencesCommentary, 1250-1320: General Trends, the Impact of the Religious Orders, and the Test Case of Predestination", in G.R. Evans (ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard(Brill, 2002), pp. 41-128.

++ Friedman, R.L.
"Auriol, Peter", in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2002 Edition), E. N. Zalta, ed. (URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/auriol/)

++ Friedman, R.L.
"Francesco d'Appignano on the Eternity of the World and the Actual Infinite", in D. Priori (ed.), Atti del primo Convegno Internazionale su Fr. Francesco d'Appignano (Appignano del Tronto, 2002), pp. 83-102.
-> deals with Francis of Marchia's reaction to Auriol's ideas on infinity and the eternity of the world.

++ Gaus, C.
Etiam realis scientia: Petrus Aureolis Konzeptualistische Tranzendentalienlehre vor dem Hintergrund seiner Kritik am Formalitätens realismus (Leiden, 2008).

Gelber, H.G.
"Logic and the Trinity: A Clash of Values in Scholastic Thought, 1300-1335", Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin, Madison (1974).
-> Especially pp. 130-43.

++ Gelber, H.G.
It Could Have Been Otherwise. Contingency and Necessity in Dominican Theology at Oxford, 1300-1350 (Leiden, 2004)
-> Auriol appears quite a bit, usually as background to the issues that the book discusses; see the index.

++ Georgedes, K.
 "The Serpent in the Tree of Knowledge: Enjoyment  and Use in Fourteenth-Century Theology," Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison (1995), pp. 190-244 (= Chapter V).

++ Geyser, J.
"Systematisches zum Problem der propositio per se nota und ihrer Rolle in den Gottesbeweisen", Franziskanische Studien 30 (1943), 73-116.
-> Auriol is a major focus in this article, reviewing essentially the same material as Schmücker, Propositio did.

Glorieux, P.
P. Glorieux, Répertoire des maîtres en théologie de Paris au XIIIe siècle, 2 vols. (Paris, 1933-34), vol. II, pp. 244-48.

++ Goris, W.
"Implicit Knowledge - Being as First Known in Peter of Oriel", Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 69,1 (2002), pp. 33-65.

Grassi, O.
Intuizione e significato. Adam Wodeham ed il problema della conoscenza nel XIV secolo(Jaca Book, 1986).
-> esp. 36-41, 149-66.

Grassi, O.
"Probabilismo teologico e certezza filosofica: Pietro Aureoli e il dibattito sulla conoscenza nel '300", in Giulio d'Onofrio (ed.), Storia della teologia nel MedioevoIII:  La teologia delle scuole(Casale Monferrato 1996), pp. 515-40
-> with good pre-1990 bibliography on p. 539.

++ Grignaschi, M
"Le probléme du contrat social et de l'origine de la civitas dans la scolastique", Album Émile Lousse Bd.1 (Louvain 1961), pp. 65-85 (on Auriol 76-82).

Grignaschi, M.
"L'ideologia Marsiliana si spiega con l'adesione dell'autore all'uno o all'altro dei grandi sistemi filosofici dell'inizio del trecento?", Medioevo5 (1979), pp. 201-22.
 

Halverson, J.L.
"Franciscan Theology and Predestinarian Pluralism in Late-Medieval Thought", Speculum70 (1995), pp. 1-26.

Halverson, J.L.
Peter Aureol on Predestination: A Challenge to Late Medieval Thought(Brill, 1998).

Henninger, M.
"Peter Aureoli and William of Ockham on Relation", Franciscan Studies45 (1985), pp. 231-43.

Henninger, M.
Relations: Medieval Theories, 1250-1325(Oxford,1989), esp. pp. 150-73.

Heynck, V.
"Die Kommentare des Petrus Aureoli zum dritten Sentenzenbuch", Franziskanische Studien51 (1969), pp. 1-77.

++ Hoenen, MJ.J.F.
Marsilius of Inghen . Divine Knowledge in Late Medieval Thought. Studies in the History of Christian Thought, 50. (Brill: 1993), passim (see index).

++ Hoffmann, F.
Ockham-Rezeption und Ockham-Kritik im Jahrzehnt nach Wilhelm von Ockham in Oxford 1322-1332. BGPTM, NF 50. Münster 1998.
-> pp. 39-43, 89-92 deal with first Wodeham and then Holcot's response to Auriol's ideas on the necessity of a supernatural form of grace.

++ Kitanov, S.
"Displeasure in Heaven, Pleasure in Hell: Four Franciscan Masters on the Relationship between Love and Pleasure, and Hatred and Displeasure", Traditio 58 (2003), pp. 285-340.
-> The article discusses Auriol's theory of beatific enjoyment (in both the Scriptum and Reportatio in Primum), along with criticisms of it by Ockham, Chatton, and Wodeham.

++ Kitanov, S.
Beatific Enjoyment in Scholastic Theology and Philosophy: 1240-1335 (Helsinki 2006)
-> esp. 110-14, 188-96.

++ Kitanov, S.
"Durandus of St.-Pourcain and Peter Auriol on the Act of Beatific Enjoyment", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 163-78.

++ Knebel, S.
"What about Aureol? Mastri's Contribution to the Theory of the Distinction of Reason", in M. Forlivesi (ed.), Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastrius (1602-1673) (Il poligrafo, 2006), pp. 415-37.
-> see the index of this volume for further articles that touch on Auriol's iimpact on Mastri.

++ Knebel, S.K.
"Aureol and the Abiguities of the Distinction of Reason", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 325-37.

Kobusch, T.
Sein und Sprache. Historische Grundlegung einer Ontologie der Sprache(Brill 1987)
-> passim , but esp. pp. 141-55.

Kobusch, T.
"Petrus Aureoli. Philosophie des Subjekts", in T. Kobusch (ed.), Philosophen des Mittelalters, Eine Einführung (Darmstadt 2000), pp. 236-49.

++ Krey, Ph.
"Nicholas of Lyra: Apocalypse Commentator, Historian, and Critic", Franciscan Studies 52 (1992), pp. 53-84.
-> Auriol appears frequently as one of the Apocalypse commentators that Nicholas' critiques.

Krey, Ph.
"Many Readers but Few Followers: The Fate of Nicholas of Lyra's 'Apocalypse Commentary' in the Hands of his Late-Medieval Admirers", Church History64 (1995), pp. 185-201.
-> Deals at some length with Auriol's Compendiumand its medieval impact.

++ Krey, Ph.
"The Apocalypse Commentary of 1329: Problems in Church History", in idem and Lesley Smith (eds.), Nicholas of Lyra. The Senses of Scripture (Leiden, 2000), pp. 267-88.

++ Kusman, D.
"Textes concernant une consultation de l’Université de Paris par le duc de Brabant et la Ville de Bruxelles en 1318-1319 : Lombards et pouvoirs en Brabant  au début du XIVe siècle »,  Bulletin de la Commission Royale d’Histoire, t. 161 (1995), pp. 171-225.
-> In 1319, Auriol was part of a commission, together with Sibert of Beek,  Jan Sindewint, and Renier the German, that answered the Duke of Brabant and the city of Brussels on the enaction of the Ex gravi canon of the Council of Vienne (on usury). Kusman's article contains an edition of that (very brief) response.
-> Thanks to Sylvain Piron for drawing this article to my attention.
 

Landry, B.
"Pierre Auriol, sa doctrine et son rôle", Revue d'histoire de la philosophie2 (1928), pp. 27-48, 133-41.
-> Cf. Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques1928, pp. 355-56, 602-03.

Lay, R.
"Zur Lehre von den Transzendentalien bei Petrus Aureoli, OFM", Dissertation, Bonn (1964).

Lee, R.A., Jr.
"Peter Aureoli as Critic of Aquinas on the Subalternate Character of the Science of Theology", Franciscan Studies55 (1998), pp. 121-36.

++  de Lagarde, Georges.
La naissance de l'esprit laicque au déclin du Moyen Age, v. 2: Secteur social de la scolastique (Louvain/Paris, 1958 second edition).
-> Chapter: Pierre d'Auriole, pp. 275-301.

++ Levy, I.C.
"Grace and Freedom in the Soteriology of John Wyclif", Traditio 60 (2005), 279-337.
-> Levy argues that Wyclif's notion of a passive reception of grace reminds of Auriol's views on the matter.

de Libera, A.
"Dénomination et Intentions: Sur quelques doctrines médiévale (XIIIe-XIVe siècle) de la paronymie et de la connotation", in S. Ebbesen and R.L. Friedman (eds.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen, 1999), pp. 355-75, esp. pp. 362-67.

++ Lindner, B.
Die Erkenntnislehre des Thomas von Strassburg (Muenster i W., 1930 = BGPTM 27, heft. 4/5)
-> Auriol, whom Lindner describes as Thomas of Strasbourg's "Hauptgegner", figures widely in this book.

++ Livesey, S.J.
Theology and Science in the Fourteenth Century. Three Questions on the Unity and Subalternation of the Sciences from John of Reading's Commentary on the Sentences (Leiden: Brill, 1989)
-> esp. pp. 68-76 on Auriol on the unity of a science, but also other places in the introduction on John of Reading's relationship with Auriol (e.g. pp. 5, 11-12, 36-37).

Longpré, E.
"Le Quolibet de Nicholas de Lyre, OFM", Archivum Franciscanum Historicum23 (1930), pp. 42-56.
-> Text edited here as q. 8 of a quodlibet of Nicholas of Lyra is actually Auriol's question De usu paupere; see F. Pelster "Nikolaus von Lyra" and "Zur Überlieferung".

Lottin, O.
"La théorie des dons du Saint-Esprit au début du XIVe s", Mélanges J. de Ghellinck II (1951), esp. pp. 871-74.

Lottin, O.
"Les vertus morales infusés dans l'école franciscaine au début du XIVe siècle", Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale18 (1951), esp. pp. 124-25.

Lottin, O.
"La connexion des vertus morales acquises au début du XIVe siècle", Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale22 (1955), esp. pp. 302-04.

Maier, A.
"Zu einigen Sentenzenkommentaren des XIV Jhs", Archivum Franciscanum Historicum51 (1958), pp. 369-93 (Reprinted in Ausgehendes Mittelalter**).

Maier, A.
"Die italienischen Averroisten des Codex Vat Lat 6768", Manuscripta8, p. 70 (1964).
-> ff. 121-50 of this ms. has extracts of 5 qqs. on  Sent.by Auriol; for a description of this manuscript, see more recently Girard J. Etzkorn, Iter Vaticanum Franciscanum: A Description of Some One Hundred Manuscripts of the Vaticanus Latinus Collection (Leiden - New York, 1996), pp. **.

Maier, A.
"Das Problem der species sensibiles in medio und die neue Naturphilosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts", Ausgehendes MittelalterII  (Rome 1967), pp. 419-51.
-> (Many of Maier's articles in this collection touch upon Auriol)

Maier, A.
Zwei Grundprobleme der Scholastischen Naturphilosophie,3rd ed., Rome 1968 (Storia e Letteratura: Raccolta di Studi e Testi 37).
-> e.g. pp. 55-56.

Manelli, St. M.
Pietro Aureoli, O. Min. (+1322), e la questione del debitum peccati, Maria. Pont. Fac. Theol. S. Bonaventurae OFM conv. in Urbe. Diss., Fasc. 42 (Naples, Tip. Laurenziana, 1961). 123 Pages.

Maurer, A.
"Ockham's Conception of the Unity of Science", Mediaeval Studies20 (1958), pp. 110-12.
-> d'après le prologue de son comment. in sententias — influence on Ockham, "tous les deux considérent la science comme un tout ordonné."

++ Maurer, A.
"Francis of Meyronnes' Defense of Direct Realism", in idem, Being and Knowing: Studies in Thomas Aquinas and Later Medieval Philosophers (Toronto: PIMS, 1990) , pp. 311-31.
-> examines Meyronnes' response to both Ockham and Auriol on intuitive cognition of non-existents.

Mollat, G.
"Auriole (Pierre d')", Dictionnaire d'histoire et de géographie ecclésiastique5 (1931), col 760-62.

Nielsen, L.O.
"Dictates of Faith versus Dictates of Reason: Peter Auriole on Divine Power, Creation, and Human Rationality", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 7 (1996), pp. 213-41.

Nielsen, L.O.
"The Critical Edition of Peter Aureoli's Scholastic Works", in A. Cacciotti and B. Faes de Mottoni (eds.),  Editori di Quaracchi 100 anni dopo.Bilancio e prospettivev. 3 (Rome 1997), pp. 217-25.

Nielsen, L.O.
"Signification, Likeness, and Causality. The Sacraments as Signs by Divine Imposition in John Duns Scotus, Durand of St. Pourçain, and Peter Auriol", in Costantino Marmo (ed.), Vestigia, Imagines, Verba(1997), pp. 223-53.

Nielsen, L.O.
"The Intelligibility of Faith and the Nature of Theology: Peter Auriole's Theological Program", Studia Theologica53 (1999), pp. 26-39.

Nielsen, L.O.
"The Debate between Peter Auriol and Thomas Wylton on Theology and Virtue", Vivarium38 (2000), pp. 35-98.
-> with editions of of two texts of Auriol's ("Determinatio fratris Petri Aureoli Utrum virtus in quantum virtus sit ens per accidens" [= appendix 1], and "<Petri> Aureoli <Quaestio de distinctione habitus speculativi et practici>" [= appendix 3]) and one of Wylton's ("<Determinatio Thomae Wylton contra Petrum Aureolum>  utrum habitus theologicus sit practicus vel speculativus").

Nielsen, L.O.
"Peter Auriol's Way with Words: The Genesis of Peter Auriol's Commentaries on Peter Lombard's First and Fourth Books of the Sentences",in G.R. Evans (ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard(Brill, 2002), pp. 149-219.

++ Nielsen, L.O.
"Peter Auriol", in J.J.E. Gracia and T. Noone (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Blackwell, 2003), pp. 494-503.

++ Nielsen, L.O.
“Logic and the Trinity: The Clash between Hervaeus Natalis and Peter Auriol at Paris”, in Pekka Kärkkäinen (ed.), Trinitarian Theology in the Medieval West (Helsinki: Luther-Agricola-Society, 2007), pp. 149-87.

++ Nielsen, L.O.
"The Quodlibet of Peter Auriol", in  Chris Schabel (ed.)., Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. The Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2007), pp. 267-331.
-> with edition of Quodlibet, q. 7 ("Utrum anima constituta ex duabus realitatibus esse possit forma corporis"), pp. 281-329.
-> See the index of the volume for other spots which mention Auriol and his influence.

++ Nielsen, L.O.
"Parisian Discussions of the Beatific Vision after the Council of Vienne: Thomas Wylton, Sibert of Beka, Peter Auriol, and Raymundus Bequini", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 179-209.

++ Noone, T.B.
"A Newly-Discovered Manuscript of a Commentary on the Sentences by Duns Scotus (Figeac, Musée Champollion, Numéro inventaire  03-091, Non Coté), Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 48 (2006), pp. 125-62.
-> A subcommentator in the version of Scotus' commentary carried by this ms "employed the ideas of Peter Auriol as a vantage point from which to criticize the thought of Scotus" (p. 139, see also passim).

Normore, C.G.
"Future Contingents", Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy(1982), pp. 358-81, esp. 369-70.

Normore, C.G.
"Petrus Aureoli and his Contemporaries on Future Contingents and Excluded Middle", Synthese96 (1993), pp. 83-92.

Pasnau, R.
"Peter Aureol", in The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy(London: Routledge, 1998).

Pelster, F.
"Estudios sobre la transmisión manuscrita de algunas obras de Pedro Aureoli OFM (m. 1322)", Estudios eclesiásticos9 (1930), pp. 462-79;  10 (1931), pp. 449-74.

Pelster, F.
"Nikolaus von Lyra und seine Quaestio de usu paupere", Archivum Franciscanum Historicum46 (1953), pp. 211-50.
-> Reattributes this text (edited in Longpré, "Le Quolibet de Nicholas de Lyre") to Auriol, but see idem, "Zur Überlieferung" for detailed argumentation of the point.

Pelster, F.
"Zur Überlieferung des Quodlibet und anderer Schriften des Petrus Aureoli OFM", Franciscan Studies14 (1954), pp. 392-411.

Pelster, F.
"Zur ersten Polemik gegen Aureoli: Raymundus Bequini O.P., seine Quästionen und sein Correctorium Petri Aureoli, das Quodlibet des Jacobus de Apamiis O.E.S.A.", Franciscan Studies15 (1955), pp. 30-47.

Perler, D.
"What Am I Thinking About? John Duns Scotus and Peter Aureol on Intentional Objects", Vivarium32 (1994), pp. 72-87.

Perler, D.
"Peter Aureol vs. Hervaeus Natalis on Intentionality: A Text Edition with Introductory Remarks", Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 61 (1994), pp. 227-62.
-> partial edition of Scriptum,d. 23 (from Vat. Borgh. lat. 329), supplements edition in Pinborg "Zum Begriff".

++ Perler, D.
Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter (Frankfurt am Main, 2002)
-> discusses Auriol and his opponents at great length, esp. 258-94, 297-307, 310-17, 322-33.
-> 2., durchgesehene Auflage 2004 (Klostermann: Frankfurt am Main).

++ Perler, D.
Zweifel und Gewissheit. Skeptische Debatten im Mittelalter (Klostermann: Frankfurt am Main, 2006)
-> Discusses Auriol briefly in the process of dealing with reactions to especially Auriol's use of sensory illusions in his cognitive theory; see pp. 239-45, 316-17 (Ockham), 266-72 (Chatton); a few further mentions in connection with esp. Francis of Meyronnes (see index).

++ Pickavé, M
"Metaphysics as First Science: The Case of Peter Auriol", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15 (2004), pp. 487-516.

Pinborg, J.
"Zum Begriff der intentio secunda Radulphus Brito, Hervaeus Natalis und Petrus Aureoli in Diskussion", Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin13 (1974), pp. 49-59.
->Rpt. in Pinborg, Medieval Semantics,ed. S. Ebbesen, London, 1984.

Pinborg, J.
"Radulphus Brito on Universals", Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin35 (1980), pp. 56-142.
-> With partial edition of Scriptum,d. 23 (from Vat. Borgh. lat. 329), pp. 133-37; cf. Perler, "Peter Aureol".

Poppi, A.
"L'antropologia averroistica nel pensiero di Pietro Auriol", Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica70 (1978), pp. 179-92.
-> rpt. in idem, Studi sull'etica della prima scuola francescana (Padua 1996), pp. 107-22.

++ Post, G.
"Ratio Publicae Utilitatis, Ratio Status, and 'Reason of State,' 1100-1300" in: Die Welt als Geschichte XXI  (1961), pp. 8-28, 71-99
-> rpt in idem, Studies in Medieval Legal Thought, Public Law and the State, 1100-1323 (Princeton, N.J. 1964), pp. 241-309 (for Auriol, pp. 294-5).

Prezioso, F.
"La teoria dell'essere apparente nella gneseologia di Pietro Aureolo", Studi Francescani 22 (1950), pp. 15-43.

Prezioso, F.
"Essenza ed esistenza in Pietro Aureolo", Rassegna di scienze filosofiche18 (1965), pp. 104-25.

Prezioso, F.
"L'intuizione del non-esistente in P. Aureolo e in G. Ockham e i prodromi del fenomenismo moderno", Rassegna di scienze filosofiche2 (1968), pp. 116-36.

Prezioso, F.
"Il nominalismo ambiguo di Pietro Aureolo", Sapienza25 (1972), pp. 265-329.

++ Rennemann, M.
"Mastri on 'praecisio obiectiva'", in M. Forlivesi (ed.), Rem in seipsa cernere. Saggi sul pensiero filosofico di Bartolomeo Mastrius (1602-1673) (Il poligrafo, 2006), pp. 399-414.
-> see the index of this volume for further articles that touch on Auriol's impact on Mastri.

++ Rijk, L.M. de
Giraldus Odonis O.F.M. Opera Philosophica. Vol II: De Intentionibus. Critical Edition with a Study of the Medieval Intentionality Debate up to Ca. 1350. (Brill 2005), esp. pp. 352-57, along with reedition of Scriptum, d. 23, pp. 695-747.

Roest, B.
Reading the Book of History.Intellectual Contexts and Educational Functions of Franciscan Historiography, 1226 -ca. 1350(Groningen 1996), pp. 183-92.

Rosato, L.
Doctrina de Immaculata B.V.M. Conceptione secundum Petrum Aureoli,Bibliotheca Immaculatae Conceptionis. Textus et Disquisitiones.  Fasc. 8 (Rome, Academia Mariana internationalis, 1959).

Schabel, C.D.
"Peter de Rivo and the Quarrel over Future Contingents: New Evidence and New Perspectives", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale6 (1995), pp. 363-473; 7 (1996), pp. 369-475.

Schabel, C.D.
"Peter Aureol on Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents: Scriptum in Primum Sententiarum, distinctions 38-39",Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin65 (1995), pp. 63-212.
-> Critical edition with introduction.

Schabel, C.D.
"Paris and Oxford between Aureoli and Rimini", in J. Marenbon (ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy,vol. III Medieval Philosophy(1998), pp. 386-401.

Schabel, C.D.
"Place, Space, and the Physics of Grace in Auriol's SentencesCommentary", Vivarium38 (2000), pp. 117-61.
-> with edition of Auriol's II Sent.,d. 2, part 3, q. 1 with ms. studies for this text and that of Scriptum,d. 17.

Schabel, C.D.
Theology at Paris 1316-1345:Peter Auriol and the Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents(Ashgate, 2000).

Schabel, C.D.
"Parisian Commentaries from Peter Auriol to Gregory of Rimini, and the Problem of Predestination", in G.R. Evans (ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard(Brill, 2002), pp. 221-65.

Schabel, C.D.
"Oxford Franciscans after Ockham: Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham", in G.R. Evans (ed.), Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard(Brill, 2002),  pp. 359-77.

++ Schabel, C.D.
"Landulph Caracciolo and Gerard Odonis on Predestination: Opposite Attitudes toward Scotus and Auriol", Wissenschaft und Weisheit. Franziskanische Studien zu Theologie, Philosophie und Geschichte 65/1 (2002), pp. 62-81.

++ Schabel, C.D.
"Doctrinal Introduction" (= "Durand and the Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents", pp. 215-39) to idem, Russell L. Friedman, and Irene Balcoyiannopoulou, "Peter of Palude and the Parisian Reaction to Durand of St. Pourcain on Future Contingents", Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 71 (2001), pp. 183-300.
->Auriol's reaction to Durand on future contingents.

++ Schabel, C.D.
"Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: Auriol, Pomponazzi, and Luther on 'Scholastic Subtleties'",  in R.L. Friedman and L.O. Nielsen (eds.), The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400-1700 (Kluwer, 2003), pp. 165-89.

++ Schabel, C.D.
"Philosophy and Theology across Cultures: Gersonides and Auriol on  Divine Foreknowledge", Speculum 81 (2006), pp. 1092-1117.

++ Schabel, C.D.
"Auriol's Rubrics: Citations of University Theologians in Peter Auriol's Scriptum in Primum Librum Sententiarum", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 3-38.

Schmaus, M.
Der "Liber Propugnatorius" des Thomas Anglicus und die Lehrunterschiede zwischen Thomas von Aquin und Duns Scotus, II Teil: Die Trinitarischen Lehrdifferenzen,BGPTM 29.1-2 (Münster 1930), passim.

Schmücker, R.
Propositio per se nota, Gottesbeweis und ihr Verhältnis nach Petrus Aureoli Franziskanische Forschungen 8 Werl-in-W. (1941).
-> Cf. Bolyard, "Knowing Naturaliter".

++ Schmutz, J.
"La querelle des possibles. Recherches philosophiques et textuelles sur la métaphysique jésuite, 1540-1767" (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Ecole pratique des hautes etudes [Paris]/ Université libre de Bruxelles, 2003)
-> see index, but particularly Ch. X, sec. 5 "L'inattendue renaissance de Pierre Auriol" (pp. 370-97).

Spade, P.V.
"The Unity of a Science according to Peter Auriol", Franciscan Studies32 (1972), pp. 203-17.

++ Spruit, L.
Species intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge. Vol. I: Classical Roots and Medieval Discussions (Leiden: Brill, 1994), pp. 286-90.

Stanonik, F.
"Über den äusseren Lebensgang und die Schrr. des Petrus Aureoli OFM", Der Katholik62 (1882), pp. 315-27, 415-27, 479-500.

Stegmüller, F.
Repertorium Commentariorum in Sententias Petri Lombardi(Würzburg 1947), pp. 314-18.
-> Cf. Tachau, "The Preparation of a Critical Edition", pp. 214-16 for updated list of mss. containing Auriol's Sent.commentaries.

Stegmüller, F.
"Ein neuer Iohannes Kommentar des Petrus Aureoli", Franziskanische Studien33 (1951), pp. 207-219.
-> edition, pp. 212-19.

++ Stella, P.T.
"La questione inedita 'Utrum in Patre essentia habeat rationem verae potentiae productivae' di Pietro Rogerii de Malomonte", Salesianum 37 (1975), pp. 547-99.
-> Pierre Roger (Pope Clement VI) in this text reacts to Auriol's trinitarian theology as found in Scriptum, d. 7, q. 1, a. 2.

Streuer, S.R.
Die Theologische Einleitungslehre des Petrus Aureoli.  Auf Grund seines Scriptum super Primum Sententiarum und ihre teologiegeschichtliche EinordnungFranziskanische Forschungen, fasc. 20 (Werl-in-W. ,1968).
-> Cf. Nielsen "The Intelligibility", esp. around n. 29.

Streveler, P.
"The Problem of Future Contingents from Aristotle through the Fifteenth Century, with Particular Emphasis on Medieval Views", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison (1970).

Suarez-Nani, T.
"'Apparentia' und 'Egressus'. Ein Versuch über den Geist als Bild des trinitarischen Gottes nach Petrus Aureoli", Philosophiches Jahrbuch93 (1986), pp. 39-60.

++ Suarez-Nani, T.
"Un nuovo contributo al problemadell'individuazione: Francesco de Marchia e l'individualita delle sostanze separate", Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 16 (2005), pp. 405-59.
-> pp. 420-22 discuss Auriol's contribution to the medieval discussion on the issue.

++ Suarez-Nani, T.
"Singularite et individualite selon Pierre Auriol", in S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (Brill, 2009), pp. 339-57.

Tachau, K.H.
"The Response to Ockham's and Aureol's Epistemology (1320-1349)", in A. Maierù (ed.), English Logic in Italy in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries(Naples 1982), pp. 185-217.

Tachau, K.H.
"Peter Aureol on Intentions and the Intuitive Cognition of Non-existents", Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin44 (1983), pp. 122-50.

++ Tachau, K.H.
"Walter Chatton on Sensible and Intelligible Species", Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 40 (1985), 711-48.
-> On Chatton and Auriol, see the short introduction (pp. 711-16) to the texts of Chatton edited in this article (II Sent., d. 4, qq. 1-4, II Sent., d. 13, q. unica).
->Thanks to Michael Rennemann for bringing this article to my attention.

Tachau, K.H.
Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology and the Foundation of Semantics,1250-1345 (Brill,1988)
-> for background and reception of Auriol passim; on Auriol esp. pp. 85-112.

Tachau, K.H
"The Preparation of a Critical Edition of Pierre Auriol's SentencesLectures", in A. Cacciotti and B. Faes de Mottoni (eds.), Editori di Quaracchi 100 anni dopo. Bilancio e prospettivev. 3 (Rome 1997), pp. 205-216.
-> See pp. 214-16 for most recent list of mss. containing Auriol's Sent.commentaries, supplemented by Nielsen, "The Critical Edition", pp. 224-25.

Tachau, K.H.
"Some Aspects of the Notion of Intentional Existence at Paris, 1250-1320", in S. Ebbesen and R.L. Friedman (eds.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (Copenhagen, 1999), pp. 331-53.

Tachau, K.H.
"In the Ambit of Another Faculty: Parisian Theologians and the (Meta)physical Universe", in J. van Engen (ed.), Learning Institutionalized: Teaching in the Medieval University(Notre Dame, 2000), pp. 129-60.

Teetaert, A.
"Un grand docteur marial franciscain, Pierre d'Auriole (Petrus Aureoli)", Etudes Franciscaines39 (1927), pp. 352-75; 40 (1928), pp. 124-57.

Teetaert, A.
"Pierre Auriol", Dictionnaire de Theologie Catholique12,2 (Paris 1935), col. 1810-81.

++ Trottmann, C.
"Vision béatifique et intuition d'un objet absent: des sources franciscaines du nominalisme aux défenseurs scotistes de l'opinion de Jean XXII sur la vision différée", Studi medievali, 3e serie, 34 (1993), pp. 653-715, esp. pp. 668-81 (on Auriol on illusions and esse apparens) and pp. 682-87 (Ockham's critique).

++ Trottmann, C.
La vision béatifique. Des disputes scolastiques à sa définition par Benôit XII (Rome 1995), esp. pp. 370-72 (related to Trottmann's "Vision béatifique et intuition") but see also index.

++ Turner, N.L.
"Jews and Judaism in Peter Auriol's Sentences Commentary", in S.J. McMichael and S.E. Myers (eds.), Friars and Jews in the Middle Ages and Renaissance (Leiden: 2004), pp. 81-98.

Työrinoja, R.
"Auriol's Critique of Henry of Ghent's Lumen medium", in J.A. Aertsen and A. Speer (eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter?(Berlin 1998), pp. 622-28.

++ Uscatescu, J.
"La teoría del bien transcendental en Pedro Auréolo en el contexto de su filosofía", Faventia 26/1 (2004), pp. 53-76.

Vanni Rovighi, S.
"L'intenzionalità della conoscenza secondo P. Aureolo", in L'Homme et son destin(Louvain-Bruxelles 1958 [1960]), pp. 673-80.

Vanni Rovighi, S.
"Una fonte remota della teoria husserliana dell'intenzionalità", Studi di filosofia medioevale,II: Secoli XIII e XIV,(Milan 1978), pp. 283-98.

++  Verweyen, J.M.
Das Problem der Willensfreiheit in der Scholastik: auf Grund der Quellen dargestellt und kritisch gewürdigt (Heidelberg, 1909).
-> on Auriol pp. 229-32.

Vignaux, P.
Justification et prédestination au XIVe siècle(Paris 1934).
-> esp. pp. 43-95.

Vignaux, P.
"Note sur la relation du conceptualisme de Pierre d'Auriole à sa theologie trinitaire", Annuaire de l'Ecole pratique des Hautes Etudes, sc. religieuses(1935 [1937]), pp. 5-23.
-> Repr. in  De Saint Anselme à Luther(Paris 1976), pp. 155-73.

++ Vollert, C.
The Doctrine of Hervaeus Natalis on Primitive Justice and Original Sin (Rome, 1947)
-> esp. pp. 124-37 (on Original Justice) and 316-22 ("Peter Aureoli and Quodlibet IV of Hervaeus" on Original Sin).

Weinberg, J.R.
The Problem of Sensory Cognition:Ockham, Descartes, and Hume(Madison 1977) pp. 33-49.

Wengert, R.G.
"The Sources of Intuitive Cognition in William of Ockham", Franciscan Studies41 (1981), pp. 415-47.

++ Werner, K.
Der Averroismus in der christlich-peripatetischen Psychologie des spaeteren Mittelalters (Wien, 1881-82; rpt. Amsterdam: E.J. Bonset, 1964).
-> pp. 4-59 deal with Auriol.

++Wlodec, Z.
"Hermann d'Augsbourg et ses 'Quaestiones de Quodlibet' dans le ms. BJ 748", Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 6 (1960), 3-50.
-> Wlodek edits two questions on the intellect and intellectual cognition from Hermann's Quodlibet and she claims that Hermann is here in discussion with Auriol (e.g. pp. 7-8); moreover, in her description of the Cracow manuscript, she mentions (pp. 11-12) a series of anonymous questions (ff. 10ra-23ra) in which Auriol is the author most frequently cited in the margin (as well as being the latest of the authors cited in the margin).

Wlodec, Z.
"Commentaires sur les Sentences, suppl. au répertoire de Stegmüller d'apres les mss... de Pelplin", Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum8 (1961), p. 37.

++ Wood, Rega
"Adam Wodeham on Sensory Illusions. With an Edition of 'Lectura Secunda,' Prologus, Quaestio 3", Traditio 38 (1982), pp. 213-52
-> pp. 213-34 (Introduction to the text) discusses Auriol a great deal, since "[t]his question [of Wodeham's] was written in reply to Peter Aureol" (p. 213).